Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 ED VR

[Nami BH]

این لنز هم در سایت آمازون برای فروش موجود است به قیمت 1149 دلار ،یعنی 100 دلار بالاتر از قیمت اعلام شده

قابل توجه دوستانی که معتقد بودند که چون این لنز از سری حرفه ای گلد رینگ نیست، به زودی به حدود 900 دلار میرسه. با توجه به روند شکل گیری رشد صعودی قیمت لنزهای کنن و نیکن ( البته بیشتر در رده حرفه ایی ها) و مخصوصا اضافه قیمتی که در ایران با اون مواجه هستیم ( توجه شما رو به مقاله دنیای اقتصاد حدود 10-15 روز پیش در باره اضافه قیمت 10 درصدی دوربینهای دیجیتال در ایران جلب میکنم)، بعید میدونم این سوپر زوم با کیفیت اپتیک نه در حد عالی، اگه از حدودها بالاتر نره (حدود 1200 دلار) پایین تر باشه. که در این صورت به نظر من اصلا ارزنده نیست.

[A.Mazaheri]

قابل توجه دوستانی که معتقد بودند که چون این لنز از سری حرفه ای گلد رینگ نیست، به زودی به حدود 900 دلار میرسه. با توجه به روند شکل گیری رشد صعودی قیمت لنزهای کنن و نیکن ( البته بیشتر در رده حرفه ایی ها) و مخصوصا اضافه قیمتی که در ایران با اون مواجه هستیم ( توجه شما رو به مقاله دنیای اقتصاد حدود 10-15 روز پیش در باره اضافه قیمت 10 درصدی دوربینهای دیجیتال در ایران جلب میکنم)، بعید میدونم این سوپر زوم با کیفیت اپتیک نه در حد عالی، اگه از حدودها بالاتر نره (حدود 1200 دلار) پایین تر باشه. که در این صورت به نظر من اصلا ارزنده نیست.

نه دوست من.دلیل اینه که ،تعداد لنزها برای فروش محدود است .و برای کسانی هست که می خواهند این لنز رو قبل از بقیه داشته باشند.اگه تو سایت آمازون دقت کنید ، نوشته Only 3 left in stock--order soon.
وقتی موجودی زیاد بشه و اکثر فروشنده ها این لنزو بیارن قیمت هم متعادل میشه.

[Nami BH]

نه دوست من.دلیل اینه که ،تعداد لنزها برای فروش محدود است .و برای کسانی هست که می خواهند این لنز رو قبل از بقیه داشته باشند.اگه تو سایت آمازون دقت کنید ، نوشته Only 3 left in stock--order soon.
وقتی موجودی زیاد بشه و اکثر فروشنده ها این لنزو بیارن قیمت هم متعادل میشه.

خدا کنه...
اما تجربه شخصی من مثلا در مورد 200-70 2.8 ISII کنن چیزی غیر از این بود، هر چی صبر کردم ارزون که نشد هیچ، گرون تر هم شد(شنیدم تو ناصر خسرو به 2 میلیون و هشتصد هم رسیده) ! این قضیه در مورد چندتا لنز جدید نیکون هم صدق می کرد. البته بعضی از دوستان معتقد هستن که این افزایش تقاضا و قیمت فقط در مورد لنزهای حرفه ایی صدق میکنه.

[farhad_k]

در سایت slrgear.com در کامنت ها ادرس سایتی هستش که نمونه عکس های این لنز رو با 18-200 مقایسه کرده که فکر میکنم بد نباشه.
http://picasaweb.google.fr/patrick.jammes/28300mmVR

[jahangir]

در سایت slrgear.com در کامنت ها ادرس سایتی هستش که نمونه عکس های این لنز رو با 18-200 مقایسه کرده که فکر میکنم بد نباشه.
http://picasaweb.google.fr/patrick.jammes/28300mmVR

این مقایسه معتبر و علمیه؟!
اگر درست باشه که این لنز مفتشم گرونه!
تو 300 mm حتی از 70-300 هم خیلی بی کیفیت تره ولی شک دارم این مقایسه درست باشه یعنی نیکون بعد از این همه مدت با این وضعیت لنز جدید میده بیرون؟!!!

[jebrahim]

این مقایسه معتبر و علمیه؟!
اگر درست باشه که این لنز مفتشم گرونه!
تو 300 mm حتی از 70-300 هم خیلی بی کیفیت تره ولی شک دارم این مقایسه درست باشه یعنی نیکون بعد از این همه مدت با این وضعیت لنز جدید میده بیرون؟!!!

البته فکر نمی کنم کسی هم توقع کیفیت 70-300 رو از این لنز داشته باشه (در 300مم)

[jahangir]

البته فکر نمی کنم کسی هم توقع کیفیت 70-300 رو از این لنز داشته باشه (در 300مم)

در 300 مم شاید ولی طبق این مقایسه در همه فواصل کانونی تصاویر افتضاحه اونم در مقابل لنزی که همه از کیفیتش مینالن
بعد از دیدن این تصاویر 18-200 ام رو به چشمام مالیدم

[A.Mazaheri]

یه ته رنگ آبی تو تمام عکسهای گرفته شده با این لنز دیده میشه.آیا این طبیعیه؟

[Amir Tavakoli]

سلام
یکی از بندگان خدا در دیار کفر این لنز رو تهیه کرده و از کیفیت عکسها و سرعت فوکوس به نسبت تامرون 300-28 که قبلا استفاده میکرده اظهار رضایت کرده

i just bought the nikon 28-300 today.i have the tamron 28-300 as well. the nikon version is much sharper than the tamron. the af-s works much faster and silent than the tamron as well

و نمونه عکسهایی که در فروم دپریوو قرار داده که اونها رو با D3s و نیکور 300-28 گرفته و اگزیف هم موجوده





کراپ از تصویر بالا و نقل قول دارنده لنز:

fringing is well controlled even at the edges wide open.

و بقیه عکسها:


28 میلیمتر



300 میلیمتر:



کراپ از تصویر بالا در 300 میلیمتر و ایزوی 8000 !!!!!

[jebrahim]

این هم چند تا ریویو توسط سه تا عکاس که به تازگی این لنز رو خریدن و نظر خودشون رو در بخش نظرات سایت آمازون وارد کردند:
کامنت دومی‌ -به خصوص- ارزش خوندن رو داره.

I'm an advanced amateur photographer shooting landscapes, nature, animals, fast cars and faster jets. I've owned Nikon DSLR's and lenses for the past five years, always upgrading as I make new purchases. I use a Nikon D300 camera body. I bought this lens to replace the Nikon 18-200mm, even though I gave up some range on the low end. As soon as I opened the box I could tell by the weight and feel of it that it is a high quality lens. I started taking a variety of shots of my dogs, inside, outside, and in a park. I was very happy with the results - even my wife complimented me on the pictures which is hard to come by. I used it last night, in the dark, zoomed all the way out to take a few shots at an outdoor symphony concert, with the ISO set at 3200. I didn't use a tripod since there wasn't room; I handheld it so I didn't expect good results. I'm amazed at the sharpness of the images. The VR II works as advertised too. Today I took it out to run it through a few comparison shots to see how well it works under nature/landscape settings on a tripod and handheld. I also took some images to merge into HDR images. The results were crystal clear and exceptionally fast set at ISO 200, even zoomed out to the max. Although it weights more than the Nikon 18-200mm lens, it's a fair exchange for the speed, reach, and clarity that result. I'm planning out my weekends around using this lens at a NASCAR race, air show, and fall foliage in the Shenandoah Valley. This lens is well worth the price; I highly recommend it.

Received this lens 2 days ago and took it around town and to a baseball game to try it out. Overall I am very pleased with it. The zoom range allows for great flexibility, the autofocus is fast, VR II superb as on other Nikon lenses. While the zoom is not as loose as the early 18-200mm lenses, you do need the included lock for it not to creep if you carry the lens pointed down on your camera. The weight of the lens as other reviewers say is quite comfortable - mine with clear protective filter comes in at 860g, just a touch heavier than the 70-300mm but not something you'd noticed without a scale. Build quality is very solid.

I tested this lens against my 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 VR and the 16-35mm f4 VR and overall I was pleasantly surprised how well the new lens did. Three things potential buyers should be aware of:
1) while the lens is listed as 28-300mm it seems to be neither quite 28mm (the angle of view is slightly narrower than the 16-35mm set to 28mm), nor does it quite extend to 300mm (the 70-300mm gets a bit more enlargement). This is not a big issue in normal use since you'd never know the difference without a side by side comparison, but if you're buying the lens specifically for either extreme of the range be aware of this. I don't have equipment to test so you'll have to wait for professional reviews to tell you exactly what the actual range is in mm.

2) while overall I'm very pleased with the quality - no ghosting during shots I took at the ballgame despite not having Nanocoating - when you compare side by side it is not as sharp as either of the other lenses and has, as is to be expected given the zoom range, more distortion. Again nothing that would jump out at you if you just saw a photograph, but side by side especially at 300mm you do notice that fine details (textures, text) are more crisp when taken with the 70-300mm.

3) The lens very quickly goes to f5.6 - by the time you're at 85mm you're at f5.6. Before buying I had wondered how this lens compares to the new 24-120mm f4, and I suspect that lens is slightly sharper and if you shoot a lot at portrait length you will fine the full extra stop (f4 vs 5.6) to be quite useful. Note I have NOT actually tested the 24-120 since it' not available yet. And of course that lens is about 25% more expensive.

Overall I'm very pleased with this lens, and despite the difference in sharpness this lens will be replacing my 70-300mm in my bag for most purposes - pretty much the only time I'd take the 70-300mm would be to specifically shoot wildlife or objects I know will be far away and I'm trying to keep the weight down (and obviously if you're really into wildlife you should get yourself a faster longer range lens than the 70-300mm).

Whenever I travel, I always take 2 or 3 lenses to experiment and take shots with. Cumbersome as it is, I don't mind because the end results are worth it. I hate being in a situation in which I wished I had a lens to take a unique photograph. However, I did not have a zoom lens with such a range. I love photographing people but not all cultures/people are comfortable with having their photos taken up close (something I would do with a portrait lens here at home). I researched and was going to buy a much cheaper Nikon lens (Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED IF AF-S VR Zoom), but then a few days ago Nikon released this one. I looked for user reviews but didn't find any. I decided to take an expensive gamble and bought the lens. I put it on my camera and went shooting the same day I received it. I was very happy with the range, the weight felt right and the lens was extremely responsive when changing subjects. I was utterly pleased with the results when I got home. I got some beautiful shots of people working in an open market whether in the sun or under shade. I never expected such crisp photos from such a long range. Overall, I highly recommend the lens for anyone who is willing to make the sacrifice to purchase such an expensive lens during these difficult times. However, it is definitely worth it. Not only will it end up being the only lens you will carry but you will also be wowed by the results.

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-28-300mm-3-5-5-6G-ED-VR/product-reviews/B003ZSHNEA/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1