Nikkor 35mm f/1.4G

[Amir Tavakoli]

خب اینم از لنز جدید




Focal length: 35mm
Diagonal Angle of view (FF): 63˚ (44˚ with Nikon DX format)
Maximum aperture: F1.4
Minimum aperture: F16
Lens Construction: • 10 elements/7 groups
• 1 aspherical lens element

Number of diaphragm blades: 9, rounded
Minimum focus: 30cm
Maximum magnification: 0.2x
Filter thread: 67mm


مثل اینکه جناب فیل اسکی هول شده و در دپریوو نوشته که این لنز لرزشگیر داره!!!

[delagah]

آمازون 1800 دلار داده قیمت رو:

[king4]

http://imaging.nikon.com/products/im..._14g/index.htm

[Mashhadi Vahid]

لنز خوبی به نظر میاد , حیف که گران است .

و ديگر اينكه اگر به جاي اين لنز، يك 35mm FX f1.4 توليد ميكردند، ديگر قيمتش 200€ نبود و 1400€ ميشد!!!

این پیش بینی مهندسان نیکون در زمان معرفی 35 اف 1.8 بود, ولی 1400 دلار کجا و 1800 کجا !!

(باز گیر ندین که اونها € گفتند, نه $ , تو دیپرویو معنیش یکیه :biggrin: )

فکر کنم نیکون با این وضعیت باید یک 50 f1.4 G N هم معرفی کنه , با اون قیمت 500 دلاریش خیلی غریب مونده بین 24 و 35 و 85 جدید ;)

[jebrahim]

فکر کنم نیکون با این وضعیت باید یک 50 f1.4 G N هم معرفی کنه , با اون قیمت 500 دلاریش خیلی غریب مونده بین 24 و 35 و 85 جدید ;)

چرا f۱.۴? منتظر ۵۰mm G N f/۱.۲ باش.

[jebrahim]

اینجا می تونین نمونه هایی از عکسهای گرفته شده توسط این لنز دوست داشتنی رو ببینید:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/950912/4#9048056

[Anoosh-Em]

درود


با سپاس از جناب ابراهیمی عزیز بعضی از عکسهای لینک مورد نظر حتما باید با پیل-تر شکن باز گردند از جمله همین عکسی که آقای ابراهیمی انتخاب کردند.

نمونه ها بسیار جالب است رنگها بسیار بی نظیر است و بوکه آن خیال انگیز است و تر کیب این دو کاملا رویایی شده

به نظرم عمق میدانی که میدهد به اندازه لنز ماکرو است !
اما شخصا چنین فاصله کانونی را دوست ندارم


انوش

[Mashhadi Vahid]

بررسی کن راکول

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/35mm-f14-afs.htm

NOT FOR DX. On DX, the 35mm f/1.8 G DX does the same thing for one-tenth the price, with a lot less weight and a better filter size. Neither of these G lenses work on manual-focus film cameras. For them, use the Nikon 35mm f/1.4 AI-s instead. For rich people, this lens works swell on DX, but no better than the 35/1.8 DX does.

Good: Nikon's sharpest 35mm lens ever, but only apparent at large apertures.

Bad: Very expensive, and 99% the same optically as every other 35mm lens or zoom for most purposes at normal apertures.

توصیه کرده این لنز را فقط برای فول فریم بخرید ؛ برای بدنه کراپدار هیچ مزیتی نسبت به نسخه f1.8 اش ندارد (با این تفاوت که قیمتش در بازار جهانی 10 برابر است!)

Buy this lens only for 35mm film or FX.

This 35mm f/1.4 G AF-S is a very expensive professional FX and 35mm film lens. It costs ten times as much as the 35mm f/1.8 DX, which does exactly the same thing on DX.

If you get this 35mm f/1.4, you don't need to carry the 24mm f/1.4 G and 50mm f/1.4 G AF-S at the same time, because they are so close in focal length. Bring only this 35/1.4 and the 85mm f/1.4 G AF-S. If you bring the 24mm f/1.4 G and 50mm f/1.4, leave the 35mm f/1.4 back at the studio. It's always a good idea to own all this, but an even better idea to carry as little as possible when you go out.

قیمت گران آن مانع از توصیه کردن به خریدش شده

بسته بندی لنز در حد ضد انفجاری

وین یت قابل توجه در بازترین دیاف (بخصوص روی فول فریم)
.... و CA پیچیده , مشابه 35 اف 1.8

کراپ 100% از تصویر بالا (بدنه D7000 بوده) :

__________________________________________

رویوی LensTip

http://lenstip.com/1888-news-Nikon_N...ns_review.html

Pros:

* high build quality,
* record resolution results on stopping down the aperture,
* slight distortion,
* silent and accurate autofocus,
* rich accessory kit.

Cons:

* not useful maximum relative aperture,
* high chromatic aberration,
* huge vignetting on full frame,
* significant coma,
* noticeable astigmatism,
* weak price/quality ratio.

The mere comparison between the number of pros and cons and one glance at the price of the tested lens shows that our summary can’t be positive. If you buy an expensive, fast fixed-focal lens you have every right to expect resolution records and the Nikkor 1.4/35 provides these. However, you don’t expect weak quality of the maximum relative aperture, high level of chromatic aberration, significant coma and noticeable astigmatism along with huge vignetting. These all flaws we get here as well. Who would you recommend this lens to? Certainly not to the users of small DX sensor – in their case it would be much sensible if they got interested in the Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.8 DX or the Sigma 30 mm f/1.4 DG HSM. These two lenses are optically on par with the tested Nikkor being definitely cheaper at the same time.

_________________________________________

و رویوی the-digital-picture که هنوز تکمیل نشده

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/r...ns-Review.aspx

[nikonian]

ریووی این لنز در photozone منتشر شد:

http://www.photozone.de/nikon_ff/596-nikkorafs3514ff

[Mashhadi Vahid]

بررسی این لنز در SLR Gear

http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1382/cat/12

Alternatives

Nikon 35mm ƒ/1.8G DX ~$200
While it's not technically a full-frame lens, hard vignetting only shows up in medium to long distances, or when the lens is stopped down. It's actually sharper and offers better performance for CA at the wider apertures than the ƒ/1.4, while having about the same distortion and light falloff. The largest advantage is price, being orders of magnitude less expensive than the ƒ/1.4 - you pay a lot for the extra 2/3 stop of light-gathering ability.

.......
.......

Conclusion
For this lens, it comes down to essentially one qualification. If you're a Nikon shooter who needs the absolute fastest 35mm lens, either for light-gathering ability or for the ability to put the background way out of focus, then for $1,800 it's either the Carl Zeiss or the Nikon 35mm ƒ/1.4G. It's not perfect - we had hoped that $1,800 would buy a bit sharper performance at ƒ/1.4 - an aperture this lens will probably spend most of its time set to - but it's still very good, and when stopped down a bit, becomes quite excellent indeed.