Canon EOS 7D

[Hamid Moradi]

مقایسه ایزو های مختلف 7 دی و 5 دی اا

ایزو 100



ایزو 200



ایزو 400



ایزو 800



ایزو 1600



ایزو 12800

http://www.cameratown.com/reviews/canon7d/ 

[Ali Talebi]

کاش با یک دوربین مدل پایین تر هم مقایسه میشد.
(البته منظورم D60 نیست) !

کسی این دوربین رو تهیه کرده؟ اصلا توی ایران اومده؟

[Hamid Moradi]

فریم ویر عرضه شده با دوربین 7 دی نسخه 1.07 می باشد
در جاهایی نسخه 1.09 هم دیده شده است
امیدواریم اصلاحات لازم انجام شده باشه

[farhad44]

سلام

دوستان تورا به خدا اينقدر ننويسيد "فريم وير" يا "فريم ور" .

اين كلمه Firmware يا فرمور است نه Frameware.

[hesamjm]

بنظر میرسه قیمت این دوربین پس از ورود به کشور حدود 1/900 باشه(بدنه)-بنقل از نوورنگار
اما هنوز در مورد فکوسش حرف و حدیث زیاده!! والا ما هم گیج شدیم
در مورد نویز که سمپل ها جالبه و مثبت ...
آخه تو بعضی فرومهای خارجی از جمله dpreview بعضی ها از فکوسش معترضند و معتثدند ناامیدکننده است ولی بعضی ها هم از فکوسش تعریف و تمجید می کنند...
نظر دوستان چیه- ؟؟؟

[hesamjm]

اگه مقایسه نویز با دوربینهای d90 یا 50d یا d300 هم پیدا کردین دریغ نفرمایید لطفا
آخه مقایسه نویزها با 5d که زیاد جالب نیود...

[Hamid Moradi]

اگه مقایسه نویز با دوربینهای d90 یا 50d یا d300 هم پیدا کردین دریغ نفرمایید لطفا
آخه مقایسه نویزها با 5d که زیاد جالب نیود...

فکر نکنم دی 90 اصلا در حد مقایسه با این دوربین نباشد
این دوربین رقیب دی 300 اس بود که ....

[QashQai]

سلام:

Has anyone figured out why Canon named the EOS 7D as they did? I thought they had a theme going with the 1000D, then the 450D/500D, then the 40D/50D and then 5D and lastly the pro level 1D series? I'm not sure I understand why they named it 7D (and didn't Minolta once had a camera called 7D and then some other brand too?). Why not 60D?

There actually is some sense of continuity in the naming of the 7D if you look at the 22-year history of the EOS system. However, the reasoning might not be obvious at first glance.

In the film era, the basic idea for EOS model numbers was clear enough: the lower the number, the higher the ranking. The EOS-1 series ranked higher than the EOS 3, which in turn ranked higher than the EOS 5 (or A2E in North America), which in turn ranked higher than the EOS 7 series, etc.

In the digital era, after some initial models were named for their sensor resolution (as in D30 for 3 megapixel and D60 for 6 megapixel), Canon changed the model numbering scheme for consumer-grade digital SLRs to a chronological base, as seen in the xxD series, the xxxD series and the xxxxD series, with an initial model in each. For example, 10D through 50D are chronological, 300D through 500D are chronological, and 1000D is most likely the first of a series of entry-level models slotted a bit lower than the xxxD series.

But above the xxD series, EOS model numbers appear to honor the original film-based sequence where lower numbers signify higher rank. In this context, the 1D series ranks higher than the 5D series for obvious reasons, while the 5D series ranks above the 7D because of its use of full-frame sensors. It remains to be seen whether this numbering scheme (or feature differentiations) will continue in future models, but it wouldn't surprise me if it did.

Why wasn’t the new camera named 60D? Because the 7D is considered to be the start of a new series in the EOS line-up. It ranks higher than xxD models like the 50D, just as the 50D ranks higher than the 500D even though both have APS-C sensors with the same resolution.

http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0909/tech-tips.html

[AslanAslan]

[mreza1001]

Pentax K7 vs Canon 7D High ISO comparisson

I have to admit... when I first saw this post, I thought to myself.. "pfft! this will be obvious" - However... after looking over the samples, I admit... I think the K7 does very well against the competitions newest product

Looking at the ISO1600 to 6400 samples between the K7 and 7D, I was genuinly surprised to see the K7 holding it's own against Canon's latest sensor

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=33390473

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=33395206

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=33390614